Democrats have, for years, been hard at work redefining men and women; they've managed to reduce the differences between the sexes to indistinguishability. The latest Supreme Court justice was unable to define a woman, and just last week, during the Democratic National Convention, democrats declared testosterone unnecessary to be a man.
One liberal media pundit put the democrats' efforts to androgenize men like this, "They are doing so in trying to put forward male figures, Tim Walz being one of them, Doug Emhoff last night, who can speak to men out there who might not be the sort of testosterone-laden, you know, gun-toting kind of guy who wants to listen to Hulk Hogan and the kind of players that came out at the RNC,"
That characterization would seem to be a big slap in the face to democrat men, but, hey... low-T liberals might find it affirmational... and enjoyable, too. Apparently, for democrats, a world without "testosterone-laden" men is a good thing. Think so? Well, let's visit the history books for a couple of examples. What if men of the past were like Tim Walz, Kamala's running mate, and Doug Emhoff, Kamala's husband... masculine toxicity-free, soft, chubby, testosterone-starved pajama boys so intimately in-touch with their femininity, they need tampon dispensers in their bathrooms?
Imagine Moses, for instance, as a Doug Emhoff type... too weak to lead the Jews out of bondage. More contemporaneously, imagine Winston Churchill as a Tim Walz type... a duty-shirking pajama boy too soft to stand up to Hitler. How different would the world be without men in possession of high levels of testosterone when they're most needed?
Well, that's an easy question to answer... the Democratic National Convention provided a clear window onto that world. Just take a look at all the so-called male conventioneers, many of them having just returned from the on-site vasectomy van, tampons firmly in place, sighing, crying, and clutching their chest-feeding bosoms as they listened to heartstrings-plucking speeches from Hillary Clinton, Michelle Obama, and Kamala Harris. Their pudgy, tear-stained faces provided the quintessential Hallmark moment... a perfect portrayal of extreme testosterone-deprivation, and a pathetic sight it was.
But the past 4 years also provides an example of what happens without healthy levels of testosterone in high places. Joe Biden's low-T presidency has been a disaster; it illustrates the old saying, "Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times; good times create weak men, weak men create hard times." That applies to women, too, and Kamala Harris, uber-liberal and wide a-Woke, is immeasurably weak. But... even though her levels of testosterone fall far short of what's necessary to run the country, she has infinitely more of it than Tim Walz and, to be sure...
Her ever-so masculine toxicity-free husband, Doug Emhoff, too.
